• If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • Stop wasting time looking for files and revisions. Connect your Gmail, DriveDropbox, and Slack accounts and in less than 2 minutes, Dokkio will automatically organize all your file attachments. Learn more and claim your free account.


Hotter than we think - the science

Page history last edited by PBworks 12 years, 7 months ago


" ... it is likely that the future will be hotter than we think."



Torn, M. S., and J. Harte (2006),

Missing feedbacks,asymmetric uncertainties, and the underestimation of future warming. Geophysical Research Letters, 33, L10703, doi:10.1029/2005GL025540.




Historical evidence shows that atmospheric greenhouse gas (GhG) concentrations increase during periods of warming, implying a positive feedback to future climate change. We quantified this feedback for CO2 and CH4 by combining the mathematics of feedback with empirical ice core information and general circulation model (GCM) climate sensitivity, finding that the warming of 1.5-4.5 C associated with anthropogenic doubling of CO2 is amplified to 1.6-6.0 C warming, with the uncertainty range deriving from GCM simulations and paleo temperature records. Thus, anthropogenic emissions result in higher final GhG concentrations, and therefore more warming, than would be predicted in the absence of this feedback. Moreover, a symmetrical uncertainty in any component of feedback, whether positive or negative, produces an asymmetrical distribution of expected temperatures skewed toward higher temperature. For both reasons, the omission of key positive feedbacks and asymmetrical uncertainty from feedbacks, it is likely that the future will be hotter than we think.


posted to ClimateConcern

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.