| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • You already know Dokkio is an AI-powered assistant to organize & manage your digital files & messages. Very soon, Dokkio will support Outlook as well as One Drive. Check it out today!

View
 

Nuclear Too Expensive

Page history last edited by PBworks 15 years, 5 months ago

http://www.enn.com/press_releases/2697

 

The Flawed Economics of Nuclear Power

 

"Over the last few years the nuclear industry has used concerns about

climate change to argue for a nuclear revival. Although industry

representatives may have convinced some political leaders that this is

a good idea, there is little evidence of private capital investing in

nuclear plants in competitive electricity markets," says Lester R.

Brown, President of the Earth Policy Institute, in a recent release,

"The Flawed Economics of Nuclear Power". "The reason is simple:

nuclear power is uneconomical.

 

In a recent analysis, "The Nuclear Illusion," Amory B. Lovins and

Imran Sheikh put the cost of electricity from a new nuclear power

plant at 14¢ per kilowatt hour and that from a wind farm at 7¢ per

kilowatt hour. This comparison includes the costs of fuel, capital,

operations and maintenance, and transmission and distribution. It does

not include the additional costs for nuclear of disposing of waste,

insuring plants against an accident, and decommissioning the plants

when they wear out.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

 

The United States, which leads the world with 101,000 megawatts of

nuclear-generating capacity, proposes to store radioactive waste from

its 104 reactors in the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository,

northwest of Las Vegas, Nevada. The cost of this repository,

originally estimated at $58 billion in 2001, climbed to $96 billion by

2008. This comes to a staggering $923 million per reactor, assuming no

further repository cost increases. (See additional data.)

 

In the event of a catastrophic accident, every nuclear utility would

be required to contribute up to $95.8 million for each licensed

reactor to a pool to help cover the accident's cost. The collective

cap on nuclear operator liability is $10.2 billion. Anything above

this would be covered by taxpayers.

 

Another huge cost of nuclear power involves decommissioning the plants

when they wear out. Recent estimates show decommissioning costs can

reach $1.8 billion per reactor. In addition, the industry must cope

with rising construction and fuel expenses. Two years ago, building a

1,500-megawatt nuclear plant was estimated to cost $2—4 billion. As of

late 2008, that figure had climbed past $7 billion, reflecting the

scarcity of essential engineering and construction skills in a fading

industry.

 

Nuclear fuel costs have risen even more rapidly. At the beginning of

this decade uranium cost roughly $10 per pound. Today it costs more

than $60 per pound. The higher uranium price reflects the need to move

to deeper mines, which increases the energy needed to extract ore, and

shift to lower-grade ore.

 

The high cost of nuclear power also explains why so few plants are

being built compared with a generation ago. In a Bulletin of the

Atomic Scientists article, nuclear consultant Mycle Schneider projects

an imminent decline in world nuclear generating capacity. He notes

there are currently 439 operating reactors worldwide. To date, 119

reactors have been closed, at an average age of 22 years. If we assume

a longer average lifespan of 40 years, then 93 reactors will close

between 2008 and 2015. Another 192 will close between 2016 and 2025.

The remaining 154 will close after 2025.

 

Only 36 nuclear reactors are currently under construction worldwide—31

of them in Eastern Europe and Asia. Although there is much talk of

building new nuclear plants in the United States, there are none under

construction.

 

Despite all the industry hype about a nuclear future, investors are

pouring tens of billions of dollars into wind farms each year. And

while the world's nuclear generating capacity is estimated to expand

by only 1,000 megawatts this year, wind generating capacity will

likely grow by 30,000 megawatts.

 

For full report visit

http://www.earthpolicy.org/Updates/2008/Update78.htm.

 

Contact Info: Media & Permissions to Reprint Contact:

Reah Janise Kauffman

Tel: (202) 496-9290 x 12

E-mail: rjk (at) earthpolicy.org

 

Research Contact:

Janet Larsen

Tel: (202) 496-9290 x 14

E-mail: jlarsen (at) earthpolicy.org

 

Earth Policy Institute

1350 Connecticut Ave. NW, Suite 403

Washington, DC 20036

Web: www.earthpolicy.org

 

posted to ClimateConcern

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.